admin
ANFET Editorial-January 12, 2026
Dankalia is not merely a region on a map; it is a living memory carved into the Red Sea’s edge, a place where the wind carries stories older than borders and where the Afar people have lived with dignity, courage, and unbroken loyalty for centuries. Its salt plains shimmer like mirrors of the sky, its volcanic ridges rise like ancient guardians, and its coastal waters have fed generations who know the sea as intimately as they know their own families. This land has shaped its people, and its people have shaped Eritrea.
The Afar of Eritrea are not a footnote in the nation’s story. They are its guardians. They watched the sea when colonial ships approached. They defended the southern front when the liberation struggle demanded sacrifice. They fought in the trenches, on the ridges, and along the coastlines — not as a separate people, but as Eritreans whose blood helped write the price of independence. Their culture, their courage, and their unwavering commitment to Eritrea are woven into the very fabric of the nation.
It is from this place of ownership, memory, and responsibility that ANFET speaks today. We speak not as distant observers, but as children of this land, as custodians of a coastline defended by our ancestors, and as witnesses to a troubling development that threatens the unity and sovereignty of Eritrea. A slogan that once echoed patriotism — “Dankalia Is Not for Sale” — has resurfaced in a distorted form. Printed on T-shirts and circulated online by the Eritrean Afar National Congress (EANC) for years, it has now been repurposed with a meaning sharply at odds with the national interests of Dankalia and Eritrea. Beneath the slogan lies a deeper struggle over identity, sovereignty, and the future of Eritrea’s territorial integrity.
Dankalia is not a bargaining chip. It is not a commodity to be negotiated with foreign powers, political entrepreneurs, or cross-border coalitions. Yet today, a dangerous narrative is being revived — one that threatens to manipulate identity, distort history, and fracture the unity that generations of Eritreans fought to build. The coastline of Dankalia, one of the most strategic in the world, has become the target of geopolitical ambition. The Bab el-Mandeb strait, the shipping lanes between continents, and the Assab corridor are not abstract concepts; they are the arteries of global trade and the focus of global competition. Foreign governments understand this. Regional actors understand this. And increasingly, political entrepreneurs understand this too.
This is why recent attempts to frame Dankalia through the lens of Somaliland-style recognition — amplified by foreign media outlets and diaspora activists — are not innocent. They are calculated. They are opportunistic. And they are profoundly dangerous. The tripartite Afar coalition spanning Eritrea, Djibouti, and Ethiopia is not a cultural initiative. It is a political project with territorial implications. When a coalition begins to speak of autonomy, recognition, or foreign partnerships, it is no longer advocating for rights — it is negotiating land. And no one has the authority to negotiate Eritrean land.
The Afar people deserve rights — real rights, not symbolic gestures or foreign promises. They deserve representation, development, cultural protection, and political inclusion in a democratic Eritrea. But these rights must be pursued within Eritrea, not through foreign-engineered fragmentation. History across the Horn of Africa is painfully clear: when external powers intervene in the name of “protecting” a community, the result is not empowerment — it is displacement, militarization, and exploitation. The Afar people deserve better than to be used as pawns in someone else’s geopolitical game.
International law is not on the side of fragmentation. Under the UN Charter, the African Union Constitutive Act, and the principle of uti possidetis juris, Eritrea’s borders are fixed, recognized, and protected. No foreign state can negotiate Eritrean territory. No sub-state group can seek external recognition of territorial autonomy. No cross-border coalition can claim authority over Eritrean land. Any attempt to do so is illegal, destabilizing, and a direct violation of Eritrea’s sovereignty. Those who promote such agendas — knowingly or unknowingly — are playing with fire.
The Horn of Africa is entering a new era of strategic competition. Ports, coastlines, and ethnic identities are being weaponized by actors seeking influence. We have seen this pattern before: Somaliland’s recognition debate, Ethiopia’s fragmentation, Djibouti’s foreign military leases, Sudan’s Red Sea instability, Yemen’s ongoing conflict. Dankalia could easily become the next flashpoint. And once a coastline becomes a bargaining chip, it rarely returns to its rightful owners.
ANFET’s position is unambiguous, unapologetic, and unshakable. Dankalia is not for sale — not to foreign governments, not to political opportunists, not to coalitions that cross borders and violate sovereignty, not to anyone who seeks to divide Eritrea under the guise of protecting its people. The Afar people are Eritrean. Their homeland is Eritrean. Their future is Eritrean. And Eritrea’s unity is not a matter of negotiation — it is a matter of survival.
The slogan that once appeared on T-shirts has become a national alarm bell. Dankalia is not for sale because Eritrea is not for sale. Its coastline is not a bargaining chip. Its people are not a geopolitical tool. Its sovereignty is not a topic for foreign discussion. Those who gamble with Eritrea’s territorial integrity — whether through media narratives, political coalitions, or foreign partnerships — must understand the gravity of their actions.
Eritrea was built through sacrifice. Its unity was paid for in blood. And its borders will not be redrawn by anyone. The world may be watching the Red Sea, but Eritreans — especially the Afar — are watching even more closely.
